National Council of Veteran Associations & Veterans with Cancer Inc

 Collaboration

 

Brian Forbes Chair of the National Council of Veteran Associations (NCVA)


Brian N. Forbes, B.Comm., LL.B

Brian Forbes holds the position of Chairman of the National Council of Veteran Associations (NCVA) in Canada. He has been the Association Solicitor for The War Amputations of Canada since 1975. In addition, he has taken on the responsibilities of Chairman of the Executive Committee of The War Amps in relation to the governance and administration of the charitable programs of the Association.

He graduated Magna Cum Laude from the University of Ottawa in 1971 and was a recipient of the Law School Gold Medal. He was a founding partner in 1973 of the Ottawa law firm of Forbes Singer Shouldice. Much of his law practice has been devoted to veterans matters and to representing disabled individuals, with particular emphasis on war amputees and civilian/child amputees.

Brian is a leading expert in veterans legislation and has extensive experience in making presentations to the various adjudicative tribunals and appellate bodies that govern the Pension Act, the New Veterans Charter and ancillary legislation dealing with veterans' benefits and entitlements. He has made numerous submissions to parliamentary committees and has taken a number of successful appeals to the Federal Court of Appeal of Canada, which have had significant relevance to the interpretation of the Pension Act as affecting the pension entitlement of seriously disabled veterans and a substantial expansion of the definition of Exceptional Incapacity Allowance.
 


The National Council of Veteran Associations in Canada is pleased to collaborate with Veterans with Cancer Inc to advocate for change to the Veterans Well-Being Act.

NCVA has Adopted Our Recommendations

 


 

NCVA has been working in concert with the Veterans with Cancer organization in Canada that has been established to draw attention to this longstanding grievance.

Veterans with Cancer has formulated the following recommendations to address the troubling adjudicative issues in regard to this entitlement problem:


  1. Remove systemic barriers for veterans with cancer. Treat veterans with the same cancer as a group and, of those, treat veterans with the same exposure as a sub-group by recognizing that these claims are identical. The processing times will be shortened for all veterans.

  2. Apply the presumptive provisions of Regulation 50, sub (g), more liberally to the benefit of veterans with cancer. In doing so, reduce the emphasis on medical evidence. However, where medical evidence exists, tying a specific cancer to a specific exposure, that evidence should be applied to all veterans with the same cancer and exposure.

  3. VAC should refer to VRAB and VAC past decisions involving delayed injuries like cancer and, when presented with the same cancer resulting from the same exposure as in a past VRAB or VAC decision, recognize and apply legal precedent. Don’t make all veterans with identical cancers/exposures individually jump through the same hoops



These recommendations reflect immediate steps that VAC can undertake to expedite current claims presently in the VAC adjudicative system.

NCVA remains convinced that VAC should:

  1. immediately expand the presumptive provisions of Section 50, sub (g) of the Veterans Well-being Act to create a form of automatic entitlement for veterans with cancer (and other enumerated conditions) who have served in conflict zones or operational duty areas where environmental hazards are known to exist, including toxic elements, burn pits, and other noxious agents, and

  2. ultimately enact legislation to parallel the American Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act which provides dual presumptions as to medical conditions covered and defined geographical areas of toxic exposures that will automatically qualify veterans for pension and health care entitlement.

NCVA Recommendations


Presumptions – Veterans with Cancer

For many years, Canadian veterans with cancer conditions have faced significant challenges when applying for VAC disability and health care benefits with regard to demonstrating that their cancer is related to their military service which involved exposure to toxic chemicals, burn pits, carbon tetrachloride (CTCs), and similar noxious agents.

Unfortunately, it has been NCVA’s experience going back decades that the greater majority of veterans with cancer have been unsuccessful with their disability or health care claims or, alternatively, the cases have taken months, if not years, to obtain proper entitlement due to the stringent evidentiary requirements imposed by VAC.

NCVA takes the position that these readily apparent obstacles and delays need to be addressed by VAC to ensure that the claims of these veterans with cancer who have been exposed to toxic environments while serving Canada are recognized as service-related.

As a positive development in this context, it is noteworthy that, of late, a number of individual claims have been granted on appeal to the Veterans Review and Appeal Board or VAC through the application of the presumptive provisions of Section 50 of the Veterans Well-being Act (parallel provisions exist under the Pension Act):

“50. ...veteran is presumed, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, to have established that an injury or disease is a service-related injury or disease, ... if it is demonstrated that the injury or disease or its aggravation was incurred in the course of:
(g) the performance by the member or veteran of any duties that exposed the member or veteran to an environmental hazard that might reasonably have caused the injury or disease or its aggravation.”

It remains our contention that a significant expansion and application of the presumptive provisions found in the Veterans Well-being Regulations, Section 50 sub (g), would augment and expedite the adjudicative process in regard to these deserving claims.

Indeed, in our judgment, it is time that the federal government through VAC adopt the approach followed in the United States when addressing these types of cancer claims in circumstances where a toxic environment has existed in the geographical areas of their military service.

In the U.S., landmark legislation has recently been passed to remedy this longstanding grievance among American veterans with cancer and their families. The Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act is a newly enacted American law that expands VA health care and benefits for veterans exposed to burn pits, Agent Orange, and other toxic substances.

For example, under the PACT Act, if a veteran has contracted cancer (or other enumerated lists of medical conditions) and has served in a conflict zone or military posting wherein toxic chemicals, burn pits, CTCs, etc. are known to have existed, it is presumed under the PACT Act that the veteran’s cancer et al is related to military service for pension or health care purposes.

This entitlement is granted automatically in recognition of the fact that the veteran applicant confronts an evidentiary obstacle course to prove the interrelationship and, in many cases, the cancer condition may have had its onset a number of years after the veteran’s military service has been completed.

The American legislation has remedied this concern by adopting a dual presumption as to the cause of the cancer and those service-related geographical areas where such toxic agents, burn pits et al are known to have been found. This interrelationship automatically triggers a disability or health care benefit for the American veteran applicant with cancer.

The new legislation actually adds 20 burn pit and other toxic exposure presumptive conditions, including cancer, reproductive issues, and respiratory issues, as well as an extensive list of exposure locations throughout various conflicts over the years, stemming from Vietnam to the present day.

In raw numbers, more than one million claims have been granted since the PACT Act was enacted in August 2022 to veterans and survivors in all 50 states who have been able to receive disability benefits under the law, totaling about $5.7 billion in benefits according to the VA Administration:

“For too long, too many veterans who got sick serving and fighting for our country had to fight the VA for their care. This will no longer be necessary.”