National Council of Veteran Associations
& Veterans with Cancer Inc
Brian Forbes
Chair of the National Council of Veteran
Associations (NCVA)
|
Brian N. Forbes, B.Comm., LL.B |
Brian Forbes holds the position of Chairman of the National Council of Veteran
Associations (NCVA) in Canada. He has been the Association Solicitor for The War
Amputations of Canada since 1975. In addition, he has taken on the
responsibilities of Chairman of the Executive Committee of The War Amps in
relation to the governance and administration of the charitable programs of the
Association.
He graduated Magna Cum Laude from the University of Ottawa in 1971 and was a
recipient of the Law School Gold Medal. He was a founding partner in 1973 of the
Ottawa law firm of Forbes Singer Shouldice. Much of his law practice has been
devoted to veterans matters and to representing disabled individuals, with
particular emphasis on war amputees and civilian/child amputees.
Brian is a leading expert in veterans legislation and has extensive experience
in making presentations to the various adjudicative tribunals and appellate
bodies that govern the Pension Act, the New Veterans Charter and ancillary
legislation dealing with veterans' benefits and entitlements. He has made
numerous submissions to parliamentary committees and has taken a number of
successful appeals to the Federal Court of Appeal of Canada, which have had
significant relevance to the interpretation of the Pension Act as affecting the
pension entitlement of seriously disabled veterans and a substantial expansion
of the definition of Exceptional Incapacity Allowance.
|
The
National Council of Veteran Associations in
Canada is pleased to collaborate with Veterans with Cancer Inc to advocate for change to the Veterans Well-Being Act. |
|
NCVA has Adopted Our Recommendations |
|
|
NCVA has been working in concert with the Veterans with Cancer
organization in Canada that has been established to draw attention to
this longstanding grievance.
Veterans with Cancer has formulated the following recommendations to
address the troubling adjudicative issues in regard to this entitlement
problem:
-
Remove systemic barriers for veterans with cancer. Treat veterans
with the same cancer as a group and, of those, treat veterans with the
same exposure as a sub-group by recognizing that these claims are
identical. The processing times will be shortened for all veterans.
-
Apply the presumptive provisions of Regulation 50, sub (g), more
liberally to the benefit of veterans with cancer. In doing so, reduce
the emphasis on medical evidence. However, where medical evidence
exists, tying a specific cancer to a specific exposure, that evidence
should be applied to all veterans with the same cancer and exposure.
-
VAC should refer to VRAB and VAC past decisions involving delayed
injuries like cancer and, when presented with the same cancer resulting
from the same exposure as in a past VRAB or VAC decision, recognize and
apply legal precedent. Don’t make all veterans with
identical cancers/exposures individually jump
through the same hoops
These recommendations reflect immediate steps that VAC can undertake to
expedite current claims presently in the VAC adjudicative system.
NCVA remains convinced that VAC should:
-
immediately expand the presumptive provisions of Section 50, sub (g)
of the Veterans Well-being Act to create a form of automatic entitlement
for veterans with cancer (and other enumerated conditions) who have
served in conflict zones or operational duty areas where environmental
hazards are known to exist, including toxic elements, burn pits, and
other noxious agents, and
-
ultimately enact legislation to parallel the American Promise to
Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act which provides dual presumptions
as to medical conditions covered and defined geographical areas of toxic
exposures that will automatically qualify veterans for pension and
health care entitlement.
NCVA Recommendations
|
Presumptions – Veterans with Cancer
For many years, Canadian veterans with cancer conditions have faced
significant challenges when applying for VAC disability and health care
benefits with regard to demonstrating that their cancer is related to
their military service which involved exposure to toxic chemicals, burn
pits, carbon tetrachloride (CTCs), and similar noxious agents.
Unfortunately, it has been NCVA’s experience going back decades that the
greater majority of veterans with cancer have been unsuccessful with
their disability or health care claims or, alternatively, the cases have
taken months, if not years, to obtain proper entitlement due to the
stringent evidentiary requirements imposed by VAC.
NCVA takes the position that these readily apparent obstacles and delays
need to be addressed by VAC to ensure that the claims of these veterans
with cancer who have been exposed to toxic environments while serving
Canada are recognized as service-related.
As a positive development in this context, it is noteworthy that, of
late, a number of individual claims have been granted on appeal to the
Veterans Review and Appeal Board or VAC through the application of the
presumptive provisions of Section 50 of the Veterans Well-being Act
(parallel provisions exist under the Pension Act):
“50. ...veteran is presumed, in the absence of evidence to the contrary,
to have established that an injury or disease is a service-related
injury or disease, ... if it is demonstrated that the injury or disease
or its aggravation was incurred in the course of: (g) the performance by the member or veteran of any duties that exposed
the member or veteran to an environmental hazard that might reasonably
have caused the injury or disease or its aggravation.”
It remains our contention that a significant expansion and application
of the presumptive provisions found in the Veterans Well-being
Regulations, Section 50 sub (g), would augment and expedite the
adjudicative process in regard to these deserving claims.
Indeed, in our judgment, it is time that the federal government through
VAC adopt the approach followed in the United States when addressing
these types of cancer claims in circumstances where a toxic environment
has existed in the geographical areas of their military service.
In the U.S., landmark legislation has recently been passed to remedy
this longstanding grievance among American veterans with cancer and
their families. The Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act
is a newly enacted American law that expands VA health care and benefits
for veterans exposed to burn pits, Agent Orange, and other toxic
substances.
For example, under the PACT Act, if a veteran has contracted cancer (or
other enumerated lists of medical conditions) and has served in a
conflict zone or military posting wherein toxic chemicals, burn pits,
CTCs, etc. are known to have existed, it is presumed under the PACT Act
that the veteran’s cancer et al is related to military service for
pension or health care purposes.
This entitlement is granted automatically in recognition of the fact
that the veteran applicant confronts an evidentiary obstacle course to
prove the interrelationship and, in many cases, the cancer condition may
have had its onset a number of years after the veteran’s military
service has been completed.
The American legislation has remedied this concern by adopting a dual
presumption as to the cause of the cancer and those service-related
geographical areas where such toxic agents, burn pits et al are known to
have been found. This interrelationship automatically triggers a
disability or health care benefit for the American veteran applicant
with cancer.
The new legislation actually adds 20 burn pit and other toxic exposure
presumptive conditions, including cancer, reproductive issues, and
respiratory issues, as well as an extensive list of exposure locations
throughout various conflicts over the years, stemming from Vietnam to
the present day.
In raw numbers, more than one million claims have been granted since the
PACT Act was enacted in August 2022 to veterans and survivors in all 50
states who have been able to receive disability benefits under the law,
totaling about $5.7 billion in benefits according to the VA
Administration:
“For too long, too many veterans who got sick serving and fighting for
our country had to fight the VA for their care. This will no longer be
necessary.”
|